Surinder Kumar v. Nipun Jindal and Another

Himachal Pradesh HC7 May 2026COPC/463/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court of Himachal Pradesh, Shimla; COPC No.463 of 2026; decided 07.05.2026; Surinder Kumar v. Nipun Jindal & another; compliance/contempt-type petition alleging non-compliance with judgment in CWP No.13094 of 2025 (14.08.2025); HRTC communication dated 23.02.2026 confirmed payment of DCRG, leave encashment and interest; petition closed, notice discharged, liberty to revive. Keywords: non-compliance, HRTC, DCRG, leave encashment, interest, retirement benefits, petition closed.

What did the court decide?

Petition closed and notice discharged, with liberty reserved to the petitioner to revive the petition if his grievance remains unaddressed. ¶¶10

Surinder Kumar Vs Nipun Jindal and Another — Himachal Pradesh HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

2026:HHC:15358

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA

¶3

COPC No.463 of 2026 Decided on: 07.05.2026

¶4

Surinder Kumar ….Petitioner
Versus
Nipun Jindal & another ...Respondents
Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Romesh Verma, Judge Whether approved for reporting?
For the petitioner: Mr. Ashok Kumar, Advocate.
For the respondents: Mr. Vinod Gupta, Advocate.

¶5

Romesh Verma, Judge (Oral)

¶6

The present petition has been filed allegedly for noncompliance of the judgment as passed by this Court in CWP No.13094 of 2025, dated 14.08.2025.

¶7

The matter was taken up in the pre-lunch session and Mr. Vinod Gupta, learned counsel, was directed to have instructions in the matter. He has placed on record a copy of communication dated 23.02.2026 as addressed by the Regional Manager, HRTC, Nalagarh to the Financial Advisor & CAO, HRTC, Shimla, wherein it has been stated that in the present case, the benefits of the judgment have been paid to the petitioner, including the payment of DCRG, leave encashment and also interest.

¶8

¶9