Disposed¶13

Dev Dutt v. Rakesh Kanwar and Another

Himachal Pradesh HC6 Mar 2026COPC/25/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

contempt petition closed; compliance with order in question; pension case processing; daily wage appointment 23.05.2001; regularization 22.12.2011; qualifying service 10 years with weightage; Deputy Director of Higher Education Chamba order dated 02.03.2026; Director of Higher Education H.P. Shimla-1; liberty to revive contempt petition; Accountant General Himachal Pradesh; High Court of Himachal Pradesh; Romesh Verma, Judge; Dev Dutt v. Rakesh Kanwar.

What did the court decide?

Contempt petition closed in view of compliance by the respondents, with liberty to the petitioner to revive the petition if the order passed by the Director of Higher Education, Himachal Pradesh, Shimla-1, is not taken to its logical end. ¶13

Dev Dutt Vs Rakesh Kanwar and Another — Himachal Pradesh HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA

¶2

Contempt Petition No. 25 of 2026 Decided on : 06.03.2026

¶3

Dev Dutt ...Petitioner. Versus Rakesh Kanwar & another ..Respondents. Coram Hon'ble Mr. Justice Romesh Verma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?¹ For the petitioner: Mr. Balwant Singh Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioner. For the respondents: Mr. Baldev Singh Negi, Additional Advocate General. Romesh Verma, Judge(oral)

¶4

Learned Additional Advocate General has placed on

¶5

record instructions dated 06.03.2026, as received from the Director of Higher Education, H.P., Shimla-1, which read as

¶6

follows:

¶7

“I have the honour to refer to the above mentioned Contempt Petition, which is pending adjudication before the Honble High Court. This case was listed on 27.02.2026 before the Honble High Court, when the Honble High Court has directed to impart instructions in the matter.

¶8

In this regard, it is submitted that the petitioner was initially appointed on daily wage basis on 23.05.2001 and his services were regularized on 22.12.2011. After adding the admissible weightage of daily wage service to his regular service, the total qualifying service comes to 10 years for pensionery benefits. Therefore, the Deputy Director of Higher Education Chamba has directed vide order dated 02.03.2026 the concerned Principal to process and forward the complete pension

¶9

1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

¶10

¶11

case to the Accountant General of Himachal Pradesh, Shimla immediately (copy enclosed).

¶12

It is, therefore, requested that the Honble High Court may kindly be apprised accordingly, on the next date of hearing i.e. 06.03.2026, please.”

¶13

2. Keeping in view the fact that the respondents have complied with the order in question, therefore, present contempt petition is ordered to be closed with liberty to the petitioner that, in

¶14

case the order as passed by Director of Higher Education, Himachal Pradesh, Shimla-1, is not taken to its logical end, the petitioner will be at liberty to revive the present petition.

¶15

(Romesh Verma) Judge

¶16

March 6, 2026

¶17

(Nisha)

Dev Dutt v. Rakesh Kanwar and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dev Dutt v. Rakesh Kanwar and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

National High Way Authority of India Vs Krishan Dei

Hppcl Vs Arvind Kumar Bansal

Chanan Dass Vs State of Hp

Baldev Singh Vs Dayal Singh and Anr.

Nirmal and another Vs Ram Dayal and Ors.

Ashwani Kumar and Another Vs Union of India and Others