Disposed¶11

Pawan Kumar v. Rakesh Kanwar and Another

Himachal Pradesh HC11 May 2026COPC/219/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Himachal Pradesh High Court contempt petition closed on compliance: Office Order dated 08.05.2026 directs pay fixation for the petitioner (contract appointee) from initial joining at 60% of minimum revised pay scale plus hike per revised notification till regularization, subject to the State's forthcoming LPA and other legal remedies; no further orders passed; petition and pending applications disposed. Keywords: contempt petition, compliance, pay fixation, contract basis, revised pay scale, regularization, LPA, COPC, Pawan Kumar, Rakesh Kanwar.

What did the court decide?

No further orders; contempt petition closed after recording compliance with the judgment under reference. ¶11

Pawan Kumar Vs Rakesh Kanwar and Another — Himachal Pradesh HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

1 ( 2026:HHC:15693 )

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA

¶3

COPC No. 219 of 2026 Decided on: 11.05.2026
________________________________________________ Pawan Kumar ....Petitioner Versus
Rakesh Kanwar & Anr. …Respondents
_ Coram
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?¹
For the petitioner : Mr. Rocky, Advocate.
For the respondents : Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General.

¶4

Sushil Kukreja, Judge (oral)

¶5

Learned Additional Advocate General has placed on record copy of Office Order dated 08.05.2026, wherein, it has been stated that the Principal of concerned school where the petitioner is presently working, has been directed to fix the pay of the petitioner from the date of initial joining on contract basis at the (60%) of minimum of revised pay scale alongwith such hike to which he is entitled to in terms of revised notification till his regularization subject to final

¶6

1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

¶7

2 ( 2026:HHC:15693 )

¶8

outcome of LPA being filed by State and other legal

¶9

remedies.

¶10

Since judgment under reference has been complied with, no further orders are required to be passed in the present contempt petition and the matter is closed.

¶11

The petition is disposed of, so also pending application(s), if any.

¶12

( Sushil Kukreja ) 11^th May, 2026 Judge (raman)

Pawan Kumar v. Rakesh Kanwar and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pawan Kumar v. Rakesh Kanwar and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Neem Akhter Vs Baldev

Krishan Lal Vs Rakesh Kanwar

Geeta Devi Vs Rakesh Kanwar and Another

Neeraj Kumar Vs Devesh Kumar and Others

New India Assurance Company Ltd. Vs Shanta Devi and Ors.

Ayush Kainth Vs Kuldeep Kaur