Disposed¶12

Neem Akhter v. Baldev

Himachal Pradesh HC8 May 2026CMP/8852/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

CMP No.8852 of 2026 in FAO No.196 of 2013, Neem Akhtar v. Baldev Singh & anr., decided 08.05.2026 by Sushil Kukreja, J. Release under Section 151 CPC of balance awarded compensation with up-to-date interest deposited in the Registry, after the FAO judgment dated 17.11.2025 attained finality; release directed after proper verification and identification by remittance to the applicant's bank account.

What did the court decide?

Release of the entire balance awarded amount of compensation alongwith up-to-date interest to the applicant/respondent No.1, remitted to his bank account after proper verification and identification. ¶12

Neem Akhter Vs Baldev — Himachal Pradesh HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

Neem Akhtar Vs. Baldev Singh & anr.

¶2

CMP No.8852 of 2026 in FAO No.196 of 2013

¶3

08.05.2026 Present: Mr. Amir Khan, Advocate, vice Mr. Vasu Sood, Advocate, for the non-applicant/appellant.

¶4

Mr. Divya Raj Singh, Advocate, for the applicant/ respondent No.1.

¶5

Ms. Kamakshi Tarlokta, Advocate, for nonapplicant/respondent No.2.

¶6

CMP No. 8852 of 2026

¶7

The present application under Section 151 of CPC has been maintained by the applicant/respondents No.1, namely, Baldev Singh, for release of the balance amount of compensation alongwith up-to-date interest, which is lying deposited in the Registry of this Court. The application is duly supported with the affidavit of the applicant.

¶8

As per the applicant, since the judgment passed by this Hon’ble Court has attained finality, therefore, the balance amount of compensation alongwith up-to-date interest may be released in his favour.

¶9

No reply is intended to be filed on behalf of nonapplicant/appellant and the learned counsel for the nonapplicant/ respondent No.2 has no objection in case the prayer made in the application is allowed, as no appeal has been preferred against the judgment dated 17.11.2025, passed by this Court and the same has attained finality.

¶10

Heard. Having perused the averments made in the application, which is duly supported with affidavit of the applicant/respondent No.1, coupled with the fact that the

¶11

judgment passed by this Court has attained finality, this Court finds it in the interest of justice to release the entire balance awarded amount of compensation alongwith up-to-date interest in favour of applicant/respondent No.1, which is lying deposited in the Registry of this Court, after proper verification and identification by remitting the same to his bank account, details whereof have been given in para-11 of the application.

¶12

The application stands disposed of.

¶13

( Sushil Kukreja ) Judge

¶14

May 08, 2026

¶15

(V.Himalvi)

Neem Akhter v. Baldev

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Neem Akhter v. Baldev

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

National Insurance Company Vs Vipin Kumar

Collector Land Acquisition Vs Shamsher Singh and Ors.

Minakshi Devi Vs Rakesh Kanwar and Ors.

Bhag Chand Thakur Vs Rakesh Kanwar and Others

Hem Raj Vs Abhishek Jain and Others

Icici Lombard General Insurance Company Limited Vs Mahinder singh and Ors.