Suresh Kumar v. Rahul Jain and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
High Court of Himachal Pradesh, Shimla; COPC No. 1234 of 2025; decided 06.03.2026; Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua. Contempt petition by Suresh Kumar (counsel P.D. Nanda) against Rahul Jain and another (respondent No.1 counsel Rajesh Prakash; respondent No.2 represented by Additional Advocate General Vishwadeep Sharma) seeking enforcement of directions in Zila Parishad, District Solan and another v. Suresh Kumar, LPA No.237/2023 (decided 13.06.2024). Proceedings closed because the Hon'ble Apex Court stayed the judgment on 16.01.2026 in SLP(C) Diary No.70389/2025; liberty reserved to petitioner to pursue appropriate remedy; notices discharged; miscellaneous applications disposed.
What did the court decide?
Contempt proceedings closed with liberty reserved to the petitioner to seek appropriate remedy for redressal of his grievance in accordance with law at an appropriate stage in future; notices issued to respondents discharged; pending miscellaneous applications disposed of.