The bench allowed the respondent's application to condone a nine-day delay in filing a Review Petition, finding the delay cogently explained, and disposed of the application.
Delay in filing the Review Petition is condoned; application allowed and disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
State of H.P and another versus Dr. Ashish Sharma
CMP (M) No. 2203/2025
06.03.2026
Present: Mr. L.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General and Ms. Menka Raj Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General, for petitioners.
Mr. Dinkar Bhaskar, Advocate, for the respondent.
CMP(M) No. 2203/2025
Reply stands filed. There is nine days delay in filing the Review Petition. This application seeks to condone the aforesaid delay.
I have heard learned counsel for both sides and gone through the case file. I find that delay is cogently explained by the respondent. Accordingly, application is allowed and delay in filing the Review Petition is condoned. Application stands disposed of.
Review Petition No. _____/2026
Be registered. Notice. Mr. Dinkar Bhaskar, learned
counsel for respondent, appears and accepts notice on behalf of respondent.
List for consideration after three weeks.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge
March, 06, 2026
(yogesh)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the delay in filing the Review Petition is condonable.
State of H.P
Dr. Ashish Sharma
Jyotsna Rewal Dua
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
