A routine order refusing an early hearing request; decides nothing of general application. The application for early hearing in the pending appeal was dismissed for want of grounds.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Narender Kumar vs. Shiv Lal and others
CMP No. 32054 of 2025 in FAO No. 233 of 2023
13.03.2026 Present:
Mr. Ishneet Rattan, proxy counsel, for the applicant.
Ms. Preetika, proxy counsel, for respondents No. 1 to 3.
CMP No. 32054 of 2025
No ground for early hearing is made out at this
stage. The application stands dismissed.
(Bipin C. Negi) Judge 13th March, 2026 (Tarun)
Narender Kumar
Shiv Lal
Bipin C. Negi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
