Petition became infructuous as reliefs sought were granted during its pendency; disposed of accordingly along with pending miscellaneous applications.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2026:HHC:6244-DB
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CWP No.828 of 2015 Decided on : 07.03.2026
Kuldip Chand ...Petitioner
Versus
State of HP and Anr. …Respondents.
Coram
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Bipin Chander Negi, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?1
For the petitioners : Mr. Naresh Kaul, Advocate.
For the respondent(s) : Mr. Gobind Korla, Additional Advocate General, for the respondents/State.
Bipin Chander Negi, Judge (Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that during
the pendency of the present petition, the reliefs as are being sought by the petitioner, have already been granted to the petitioner and in view thereof, the present petition has become infructuous.
(Bipin Chander Negi) Judge
07th March, 2026
(Gaurav Rawat)
1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the Judgment? Yes
Kuldip Chand
State of HP
Bipin Chander Negi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
