Disposed¶10

Ajeet Singh Diwan and Others v. State of Hp and Others

Himachal Pradesh HC10 Oct 2025EX.P./356/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Six execution petitions (EP Nos. 356, 357, 358, 359, 360, 361 of 2025) against State of H.P. and Others disposed of without adjudication; restraint traced to Principal Division Bench order dated 21.07.2025 in LPA No.121 of 2024 with LPA Nos. 111, 118, 119, 173, 366 of 2024 directing that execution petitions shall not be pressed till LPA disposal; liberty to revive reserved to petitioners; Himachal Pradesh High Court, Shimla; Sandeep Sharma, J. (Oral); decision date 10.10.2025; counsel: Virender Thakur for petitioners; Anup Rattan AG with Rajan Kahol, Vishal Panwar (Addl. AGs) and Ravi Chauhan (Dy. AG) for State.

What did the court decide?

Liberty reserved to the petitioners to get the present petitions revived after disposal of the LPAs, if required and desired. ¶10

Ajeet Singh Diwan and Others Vs State of Hp and Others — Himachal Pradesh HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA

¶2

Execution Petition Nos.358, 356, 357, 359, 360 and 361 of 2025 Date of Decision: 10.10.2025

¶3

__________________________ 1. Execution Petition	____________________ No.358 of 2025	_______________________
Babu Ram	Versus	……...Petitioner
State of H.P. and Others		…....Respondents
2. Execution Petition	No.356 of 2025
Ajeet Singh Diwan and Ot State of H.P. and Others	hers Versus	……...Petitioners …....Respondents
3. Execution Petition	No.357 of 2025
Rakesh Kumar	Versus	……...Petitioner
State of H.P. and Others		…....Respondents
4. Execution Petition	No.359 of 2025
Sita Ram and Others	Versus	……...Petitioners
State of H.P. and Others		…....Respondents
5. Execution Petition	No.360 of 2025
Ranjha Ram and Others	Versus	……...Petitioners
State of H.P. and Others		…....Respondents
6. Execution Petition	No.361 of 2025
Watan Singh Banyal and O State of H.P. and Others	thers Versus	……...Petitioners …....Respondents

¶4

Coram

¶5

Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? For the Petitioner(s): Mr. Virender Thakur, Advocate.

¶6

For the Respondents: Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General, with Mr. Rajan Kahol & Mr. Vishal Panwar, Additional Advocates General, with Mr. Ravi Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General, for State.

¶7

¶8

Sandeep Sharma, J. (Oral)

¶9

While placing on record copy of order dated 21.07.2025 passed by Principal Division Bench of this Court in LPA No.121 of 2024 along with LPA Nos.111, 118, 119, 173 and 366 of 2024, Mr. Vishal Panwar, learned Additional Advocate General, states that in afore LPAs, preferred by the respondents, it has been ordered that till the disposal of the LPAs, execution petitions shall not be pressed and as such, at present, no orders can be passed in the execution proceedings.

¶10

Having perused aforesaid order, there appears to be merit in the contention of learned Additional Advocate General and as such, present petitions are disposed of at this stage, reserving liberty to the petitioners to get the present petitions revived, after disposal of LPAs, if required and desired.

¶11

October 10, 2025

¶12

(Rajeev Raturi)

¶13

(Sandeep Sharma), Judge

Ajeet Singh Diwan and Others v. State of Hp and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ajeet Singh Diwan and Others v. State of Hp and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Naresh Kumar and Others Vs the State of Hp and Others

Savitri Devi Vs the State of Hp and Others

Vivek Modgil and Another Vs State of Hp and Others

Himani Dhiman and Another Vs the State of Hp and Others

Roop Ram Vs State of Hp and Others

Malkiat Singh Vs the State of Hp and Others