Disposed¶9

Naresh Kumar and Others v. the State of Hp and Others

Himachal Pradesh HC9 Oct 2025CWP/15841/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

CWP 15841 of 2025; Naresh Kumar v. State of H.P.; representation Annexure P-3; disposal without notice or merits; six-week timeline; opportunity of hearing; detailed speaking order; reliance on coordinate bench ruling in CWP No.1638 of 2024 Mohit Sharma; liberty reserved; pending applications disposed; Sandeep Sharma, Judge; decision dated 09.10.2025.

What did the court decide?

Direction to respondents/competent authority to consider and decide the petitioners' pending representation (Annexure P-3) expeditiously, preferably within six weeks, in light of CWP No.1638 of 2024 (Mohit Sharma), after affording an opportunity of hearing and passing a detailed speaking order; liberty reserved to the petitioners to pursue further remedies if still aggrieved. ¶9

Naresh Kumar and Others Vs the State of Hp and Others — Himachal Pradesh HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA

¶2

CWP No.15841 of 2025 Date of Decision: 09.10.2025

¶3

__________________________________________________________ Naresh Kumar and Others …….Petitioners Versus State of H.P. & Others ….Respondents _________________________________________________________ Coram:_ Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?¹ For the Petitioners: Mr. Vivek Thakur, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. Rajan Kahol & Mr. Vishal Panwar, Additional Advocates General, with Mr. Ravi Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General, for State. __________________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, Judge (oral):

¶4

Before notices, if any, could be issued to the respondents, learned counsel representing the petitioners, on instructions, states that his clients would be content and satisfied in case their pending representation (Annexure P-3) is considered and decided by the competent authority in light of judgment rendered by Coordinate Bench of this Court in CWP No.1638 of 2024, titled as Mohit Sharma and Another Vs. State of H.P. and Others , in a time bound manner.

¶5

Mr. Rajan Kahol, learned Additional Advocate General, representing the respondents/State, fairly states that he is not averse to aforesaid innocuous prayer made on behalf of the petitioners and

¶6

1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

¶7

-2-

¶8

representation, if any, filed by the petitioners shall be considered and decided in accordance with the aforesaid judgment

¶9

Consequently, in view of the above, this Court without going into the merits of the case, deems it fit to dispose of the present petition with a direction to the respondents to consider and decide the pending representation (Annexure P-3) of the petitioners expeditiously, preferably within a period of six weeks. Ordered accordingly. Needless to say, authority concerned, while doing the needful in terms of instant order, shall afford an opportunity of hearing to the petitioners and pass detailed speaking order thereupon taking note of the judgment rendered by Coordinate Bench of this Court in Mohit Sharma case (supra), wherein issue otherwise sought to be decided in the instant proceedings already stands adjudicated. Liberty is reserved to the petitioners to file appropriate proceedings in appropriate Court of law, if they still remain aggrieved.

¶10

Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of.

¶11

(Sandeep Sharma), Judge

¶12

October 09, 2025 (Rajeev Raturi)

Naresh Kumar and Others v. the State of Hp and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Naresh Kumar and Others v. the State of Hp and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Cases cited

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kusum Kumari Sood Vs Hpu

Himani Kumari Vs the State of Hp and Others

Kavita Kumari Vs the State of Hp and Another

Savitri Devi Vs the State of Hp and Others

Vivek Modgil and Another Vs State of Hp and Others

Ashok Kumar Vs State of Hp