Disposed¶32

Hem Singh v. the State of Hp and Others

Himachal Pradesh HC2 May 2025CWP/7140/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Himachal Pradesh High Court, Shimla; CWP No.7140 of 2025; Hem Singh v. State of H.P. and others; benefits of Satya Devi (CWP No.2274 of 2021, decided 28.05.2024); operation of common judgment stayed by Apex Court order dated 24.03.2025; SLP(C) No.20496/2024; State of Himachal Pradesh & Ors. v. Inder Pal, SLP(C) Diary No.11306/2025; conditional benefits subject to outcome of pending SLP; writ petition disposed; miscellaneous applications disposed; Judge Jyotsna Rewal Dua; advocates Bonit Prakash and Y.P.S.Dhaulta.

What did the court decide?

Benefits, if any, flowing to the petitioner under Satya Devi's case shall abide by the outcome of the Inder Pal case (SLP(C) Diary No.11306/2025); pending miscellaneous applications, if any, stand disposed of. ¶32

Hem Singh Vs the State of Hp and Others — Himachal Pradesh HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA

¶2

CWP No.7140 of 2025

¶3

Decided on: 2^nd May, 2025

¶4

Hem Singh …..Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

State of H.P. and others

¶7

.....Respondents

¶8

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Coram

¶9

Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua

¶10

Whether approved for reporting?¹

¶11

For the Petitioner: Mr. Bonit Prakash, Advocate.

¶12

For the Respondents: Mr. Y.P.S.Dhaulta, Additional Advocate General.

¶13

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge

¶14

Petitioner seeks benefits of the decision rendered

¶15

in Satya Devi Versus State of H.P. and others² .

¶16

2. Learned Additional Advocate General submits that

¶17

the judgment in Satya Devi’s² case has been assailed by the respondents by filing Special Leave Petition (Civil)

¶18

No.20496/2024 . The common decision passed in several other matters connected with Satya Devi’s² case has also

¶19

been assailed by the respondents by filing separate Special

¶20

1 Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes.

¶21

² CWP No.2274 of 2021, decided alongwith connected matters on 28.05.2024

¶22

¶23

Leave Petitions including State of Himachal Pradesh & Ors. Vs. Inder Pal³ . Copy of an order passed by the Hon’ble

¶24

Apex Court on 24.03.2025 in several connected Special Leave

¶25

Petitions with lead case State of Himachal Pradesh & Ors.

¶26

Vs. Inder Pal³ has been perused, which reads as under:-

¶27

“1. Delay condoned.

¶28

2. Let the notice be issued to the respondent(s) in all the matters.

¶29

3. Tag alongwith SLP(C) No.20496/2024.

¶30

4. In the meantime the operation of the impugned order(s) is/are stayed.”

¶31

In view of the fact that operation of impugned

¶32

order(s) (common judgment rendered on 28.05.2024) in all connected Special Leave Petitions has been stayed by the Hon’ble Apex Court, this writ petition is disposed of with direction that benefits, if any, flowing to the petitioner under Satya Devi’s² case, shall abide by the outcome of the Inder Pal’s³ case instituted by the respondents against the common judgment rendered in Satya Devi’s² case. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.

¶33

Jyotsna Rewal Dua May 2, 2025 Judge R.Atal

¶34

3 Special Leave Petition (Civil) Diary No.11306/2025

Hem Singh v. the State of Hp and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Hem Singh v. the State of Hp and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sonia Vs the State of Hp and Others

Dan Singh Vs the State of Hp and Others

Hem Lata Vs State of Hp and Others

Sujata Devi Vs State of Hp and Others

Mohit Sharma and Another Vs State of Hp and Others

Santosh Kumar Vs State of Hp and Others