Dismissed¶18

Sujata Devi v. State of Hp and Others

Himachal Pradesh HC2 May 2025CWP/3796/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Withdrawal of writ petitions; liberty to file afresh; dismissal as withdrawn; Himachal Pradesh Recruitment and Conditions of Service of Government Employees Act, 2024; State of H.P.; CWP Nos. 3788/3790/3792/3794/3796/3798 of 2025; High Court of Himachal Pradesh at Shimla; Jyotsna Rewal Dua; pending miscellaneous applications.

What did the court decide?

Liberty to withdraw the writ petitions and file afresh in accordance with law, inter alia assailing The Himachal Pradesh Recruitment and Conditions of Service of Government Employees Act, 2024; pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, likewise disposed of with the dismissal as withdrawn. ¶18

Sujata Devi Vs State of Hp and Others — Himachal Pradesh HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA

¶2

CWP No.3796 of 2025 and connected matters

¶3

Decided on: 02.05. 2025

¶4

____ 1.	____________________________________ CWP No. 3796 of 2025 Sujata Devi	_________________________ ....Petitioner
____	Versus State of H.P. & Ors. ____________________________________	…Respondents _________________________
2.	CWP No. 3798 of 2025 Manoj Kumar	....Petitioner
____	Versus State of H.P. & Ors. ____________________________________	…Respondents _________________________
3.	CWP No. 3788 of 2025 Sangeeta Rani	....Petitioner
	Versus State of H.P. & Ors.	…Respondents
______ 4.	___________________________________ CWP No. 3790 of 2025 Virbhader Singh	_________________________ ....Petitioner
____	Versus State of H.P. & Ors. ____________________________________	…Respondents _________________________

¶5

¶6

5. CWP No. 3792 of 2025 Sapna Kumari ....Petitioner

¶7

	Versus State of H.P. & Ors.	…Respondents
____ 6.	____________________________________ CWP No. 3794 of 2025	_________________________
	Sujata Sharma	....Petitioner
	Versus
____	State of H.P. & Ors. ____________________________________	…Respondents _________________________

¶8

Coram

¶9

Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua

¶10

1 Whether approved for reporting?

¶11

_________________________ For the petitioners:	________________________________________ Mr. Pankaj Thakur, Advocate.
For the respondents:	Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Mr. Y.P.S. Dhaulta, Additional Advocate General.

¶12

Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge

¶13

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that

¶14

due to developments that have taken place post the filing of these writ petitions, more specifically the enactment, i.e. The Himachal Pradesh Recruitment and Conditions of Service of

¶15

1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? yes

¶16

¶17

Government Employees Act, 2024, these writ petitions in the present form, cannot proceed ahead, therefore, the petitioners be permitted to withdraw the present writ petitions with liberty to file afresh in accordance with law, inter alia, assailing the aforesaid enactment.

¶18

2. Prayer is accepted. Granting such liberty, the writ petitions are dismissed as withdrawn alongwith pending miscellaneous application(s), if any.

¶19

Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge

¶20

May 2, 2025

¶21

R.Atal

Sujata Devi v. State of Hp and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sujata Devi v. State of Hp and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sonia Vs the State of Hp and Others

Dan Singh Vs the State of Hp and Others

Hem Lata Vs State of Hp and Others

Hem Singh Vs the State of Hp and Others

Mohit Sharma and Another Vs State of Hp and Others

Santosh Kumar Vs State of Hp and Others