Jai Singh and Another v. the State of Hp and Others
Case brief
What is this about?
CWP No. 4645 of 2025, High Court of Himachal Pradesh at Shimla, decided 01.04.2025 (oral) by Justice Ajay Mohan Goel; neutral citation 2025:HHC:8584; approved for reporting. Keywords: locus standi; maintainability of writ petition; second/third generation challenge; orders attained finality; delay of almost 30 years; Nautor land; Revenue Revision No. 263 of 1984; Financial Commissioner (Appeals); Khasra No. 231/1, Mohal Maseran/307, Tehsil Sadar, District Mandi; floodgate of litigation; certiorari and mandamus refused; writ petition dismissed. No statutes or precedents cited in the judgment.
What did the court decide?
The petitioners have no locus standi to file and maintain the writ petition: their father, the person actually aggrieved by the orders, was satisfied with them and never assailed them, and the orders had been in existence for almost 30 years when he died in 2015.