Pammi Kumar and Ors. v. Rajesh Sharma and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
Pammi Kumar and others v. Rajesh Shrma and another, COPC No. 242 of 2025, High Court of Himachal Pradesh, Shimla, decided 01.04.2025 (Ajay Mohan Goel, J., oral order). Compliance/monitoring proceedings: the learned Additional Advocate General (for respondents) submitted that the needful in terms of the Court's earlier judgment would be done within three weeks; statement taken on record; proceedings closed with liberty to the petitioner to seek revival on default; notice discharged. No statutory provisions or precedents discussed; no monetary quantum involved.
What did the court decide?
Proceedings closed upon the learned Additional Advocate General's submission that the needful in terms of this Court's earlier judgment would be done within three weeks; liberty reserved to the petitioner to approach this Court for revival of the proceedings if the needful is not done within three weeks; notice discharged.