Disposed¶24

Surinder Singh v. the State of Hp and Others

Himachal Pradesh HC5 Dec 2025CWP/19244/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

CWP No.19244 of 2025, HC Himachal Pradesh, decided 05.12.2025, Jyotsna Rewal Dua J. Direction to decide pending representation dated 17.09.2025 (Annexure P-4) on Oma Wati (CWPOA No.5507 of 2020) applicability within six weeks; disposal without merits; no costs; mandamus-type limited relief.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the respondents/competent authority to consider and decide the petitioner's representation dated 17.09.2025 (Annexure P-4) in accordance with law, taking into consideration the Oma Wati judgment, within six weeks, and to communicate the decision to the petitioner; pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also disposed of. ¶24

Surinder Singh Vs the State of Hp and Others — Himachal Pradesh HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA

¶3

CWP No.19244 of 2025

¶4

Decided on: 05.12.2025

¶5

---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Surinder Singh …..Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State of H.P. and another

¶8

.....Respondents

¶9

---------------------------------------------------------------------------Coram

¶10

Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua

¶11

Whether approved for reporting?¹

¶12

For the Petitioner: Mr. Balwant Singh Thakur, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. L.N.Sharma, Additional Advocate General and Ms. Menka Raj Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge

¶13

Notice. Mr. L.N.Sharma, learned Additional

¶14

Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents.

¶15

2. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the matter is heard at this stage.

¶16

3. Petitioner’s grievance is that his representation dated 17.09.2025 (Annexure P-4) seeking applicability of Oma Wati and another versus State of Himachal

¶17

Pradesh and others² has not been decided till date by the

¶18

respondents/competent authority. Learned counsel for the

¶19

1 Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes.

¶20

2 CWPOA No.5507 of 2020, decided on 21.08.2023.

¶21

¶22

petitioner submitted that the petitioner would be content in case the respondents/competent authority(s) are directed to consider and decide the aforesaid representation in accordance with law within a fixed-time schedule. Learned Additional Advocate General is not averse to this prayer.

¶23

4. Having regard to the afore-submissions, but without examining the merits of the matter, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents/ competent authority to consider and decide the aforesaid representation of the petitioner dated 17.09.2025 (Annexure P-4) in accordance with law as well as taking into consideration the above judgment in the case of Oma Wati² within a period of six weeks from today. The decision so arrived at shall also be communicated to the petitioner.

¶24

The writ petition stands disposed of in the above terms, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any.

¶25

December 05, 2025 yogesh

¶26

Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge

Surinder Singh v. the State of Hp and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Surinder Singh v. the State of Hp and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Surjeet Singh Vs the Cskhpkv

Urmila Nadda Vs State of Hp and Ors.

Sem Lata Vs the State of Hp and Others

Jeet Ram and Others Vs the State of Hp and Others

Udesh Chauhan and Others Vs the State of Hp and Others

Ayush Sharma Vs the State of Hp and Others