Dismissed¶42

Suman Kumari v. the State of Hp and Others

Himachal Pradesh HC4 Mar 2025CWP/1248/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Dismissal of writ petitions as withdrawn with liberty to file afresh; Himachal Pradesh Recruitment and Conditions of Service of Government Employees Act, 2024; withdrawal prayer accepted; pending miscellaneous applications disposed of; State of H.P.; CWP No.1230/2025, 1232/2025, 1240/2025, 1242/2025, 1244/2025, 1246/2025, 1248/2025, 1264/2025; Jyotsna Rewal Dua, J; decided 04.03.2025; no adjudication on merits; no precedents cited.

What did the court decide?

All eight connected writ petitions dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty granted to the petitioners to file afresh, in accordance with law, inter alia assailing the Himachal Pradesh Recruitment and Conditions of Service of Government Employees Act, 2024; pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stand disposed of. ¶42

Suman Kumari Vs the State of Hp and Others — Himachal Pradesh HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA

¶2

CWP No.1230/2025 alongwith connected matters Decided on: 04.03.2025

¶3

1. CWP No.1230/2025

¶4

Sushant Kumar …Petitioner

Versus

State of H.P. & Ors.

.…Respondents.

2. CWP No.1232/2025

¶9

Manjeet Kumar …Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & Ors. .…Respondents.

¶10

3. CWP No.1240/2025

¶11

Suresh Kumar & Anr. …Petitioner Versus

¶12

State of H.P. & Ors.

¶13

.…Respondents.

¶14

4. CWP No.1242/2025

¶15

Nitika …Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & Ors. .…Respondents.

¶16

5. CWP No.1244/2025

¶17

Dinesh Attri …Petitioner

¶18

Versus

¶19

State of H.P. & Ors. .…Respondents.

¶20

6. CWP No.1246/2025

¶21

Monika Sharma …Petitioner

Versus

State of H.P. & Ors.

.…Respondents.

7. CWP No.1248/2025

¶26

Suman Kumari …Petitioner

¶27

Versus

¶28

¶29

State of H.P. & Ors. .…Respondents.

¶30

8. CWP No.1264/2025

¶31

Asha Kumari & Anr. …Petitioners Versus

¶32

State of H.P. & Ors. .…Respondents.

¶33

………………………………………………………………………………. Coram

¶34

Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge.

¶35

Whether approved for reporting?¹

¶36

For the petitioners: Mr. Skandh Shah, Advocate vice Mr. Sat Parkash, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Mr. L.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General.

¶37

Jyotsna Rewal Dua , J

¶38

Learned counsel for the petitioner(s) submits that due

¶39

to developments that have taken place post the filing of the writ petitions, more specifically the enactment, i.e. the Himachal Pradesh Recruitment and Conditions of Service of Government Employees Act, 2024, the writ petitions, in their present form, cannot proceed ahead, therefore, the petitioners be permitted to withdraw the present writ petitions with liberty to file afresh, in accordance with law, inter alia , assailing the aforesaid enactment. Prayer is accepted.

¶40