Dismissed¶¶43

Suresh Kumar and Another v. the State of Hp and Others

Himachal Pradesh HC4 Mar 2025CWP/1240/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Withdrawal of writ petitions with liberty to file afresh assailing the Himachal Pradesh Recruitment and Conditions of Service of Government Employees Act, 2024; CWP No.1230/2025 and connected matters (1232, 1240, 1242, 1244, 1246, 1248, 1264/2025); dismissed as withdrawn; liberty granted; pending miscellaneous applications disposed of; Bench: Jyotsna Rewal Dua, J.; decided 04.03.2025; no merits decided; no cases cited.

What did the court decide?

Liberty to file afresh, in accordance with law, inter alia assailing the Himachal Pradesh Recruitment and Conditions of Service of Government Employees Act, 2024; petitions dismissed as withdrawn; pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, disposed of. ¶¶43

Suresh Kumar and Another Vs the State of Hp and Others — Himachal Pradesh HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA

¶2

CWP No.1230/2025 alongwith connected matters Decided on: 04.03.2025

¶3

1. CWP No.1230/2025

¶4

Sushant Kumar …Petitioner

Versus

State of H.P. & Ors.

.…Respondents.

2. CWP No.1232/2025

¶9

Manjeet Kumar …Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & Ors. .…Respondents.

¶10

3. CWP No.1240/2025

¶11

Suresh Kumar & Anr. …Petitioner Versus

¶12

State of H.P. & Ors.

¶13

.…Respondents.

¶14

4. CWP No.1242/2025

¶15

Nitika …Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & Ors. .…Respondents.

¶16

5. CWP No.1244/2025

¶17

Dinesh Attri …Petitioner

¶18

Versus

¶19

State of H.P. & Ors. .…Respondents.

¶20

6. CWP No.1246/2025

¶21

Monika Sharma …Petitioner

Versus

State of H.P. & Ors.

.…Respondents.

7. CWP No.1248/2025

¶26

Suman Kumari …Petitioner

¶27

Versus

¶28

¶29

State of H.P. & Ors. .…Respondents.

¶30

8. CWP No.1264/2025

¶31

Asha Kumari & Anr. …Petitioners Versus

¶32

State of H.P. & Ors. .…Respondents.

¶33

………………………………………………………………………………. Coram

¶34

Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge.

¶35

Whether approved for reporting?¹

¶36

For the petitioners: Mr. Skandh Shah, Advocate vice Mr. Sat Parkash, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Mr. L.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General.

¶37

Jyotsna Rewal Dua , J

¶38

Learned counsel for the petitioner(s) submits that due

¶39

to developments that have taken place post the filing of the writ petitions, more specifically the enactment, i.e. the Himachal Pradesh Recruitment and Conditions of Service of Government Employees Act, 2024, the writ petitions, in their present form, cannot proceed ahead, therefore, the petitioners be permitted to withdraw the present writ petitions with liberty to file afresh, in accordance with law, inter alia , assailing the aforesaid enactment. Prayer is accepted.

¶40