Tanuj Sharma v. Pawan Kumar
Case brief
What is this about?
Tanuj Sharma v. Pawan Kumar, Cr. Appeal No. 338 of 2012, High Court of Himachal Pradesh at Shimla, decided 05.12.2025 by Sushil Kukreja, Judge. Appeal against judgment of acquittal dated 30.04.2012 by learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Nahan, District Sirmaur, H.P., in a complaint case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. Dismissed for want of prosecution: appellant duly served with court notice but absent despite repeated calls, no counsel for appellant (none for the appellant); respondent represented by Mr. Aditya Chouhan, Advocate. Pending application(s), if any, disposed of. No cases cited, no monetary quantum.
What did the court decide?
Court notice issued to the appellant was received back duly served, yet there was no representation on his behalf. ¶¶4