Disposed¶13

Narayan Singh v. the State of Hp and Others

Himachal Pradesh HC11 Mar 2025CMP/3723/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Parole extension refused; CMP No.3723 of 2025 in CWP No.11599 of 2024; applicant Narayan Singh; respondents-State of Himachal Pradesh (counsel: Rajendera Gulati, Anil Kumar Manget for applicant; Arsh Rattan, DAG for State); ground: wife's ailment per medical slip/OP Card of PHC Chhatri, Tehsil Thunag, District Mandi, HP dated 10.03.2025; ailment held general in nature for a person aged 50; surrender directed on 17.03.2025 at 10:00 a.m. before Jail Superintendent; bench G.S. Sandhawalia (Chief) and Ranhan Sharma (Judge); decision dated 11.03.2025 / March 11, 2025; no statute or case cited.

What did the court decide?

Two-week extension of parole not granted; application disposed of with a direction that the applicant surrender on 17.03.2025 at 10:00 a.m. before the Jail Superintendent concerned. ¶13

Narayan Singh Vs the State of Hp and Others — Himachal Pradesh HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

Two-week extension of parole not granted; application disposed of with a direction that the applicant surrender on 17.03.2025 at 10:00 a.m. before the Jail Superintendent concerned.

¶13

Issue for consideration

Whether the applicant's parole (42 days granted vide judgment dated 10.01.2025 in the main case) should be extended on the ground of the ailment of the applicant's wife, as evidenced by the medical slip / Out Patient Card of the Primary Health Centre Chhatri dated 10.03.2025, given that his surrender fell due on 11.03.2025.

¶7

Court's answer

On perusal of the Out Patient Card issued by the Primary Health Centre Chhatri, the Court found that the ailment recorded was of a general nature, such as a person aged 50 years might be suffering, and therefore did not justify extension of parole.

¶9

Ratio / Principle

The Court was not inclined to grant the application for extension for a period of two weeks and, resultantly, disposed of the application with a direction that the applicant surrender on 17.03.2025 at 10:00 a.m. before the Jail Superintendent concerned.

¶13

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Narayan Singh v. State of Himachal Pradesh & Others - CMP No.3723 of 2025 in CWP No.11599 of 2024 [Disposed of matter] (Item P-2), decided 11.03.2025 by G.S. Sandhawalia, Chief, and Ranjan Sharma, Judge. The applicant, who had been granted benefit of parole for 42 days vide judgment dated 10.01.2025 in the main case, sought extension of parole on the ground of the ailment of his wife, relying on a medical slip dated 10.03.2025 of the Primary Health Centre Chhatri, Tehsil Thunag, District Mandi, HP. On perusal of the Out Patient Card, the Court observed the ailment was 'of general nature, as a person aged 50 years might be suffering'; it declined the orally prayed two-week extension and disposed of the application with a direction that the applicant surrender on 17.03.2025 at 10:00 a.m. before the Jail Superintendent concerned. No statute or precedent was cited.

Narayan Singh v. the State of Hp and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Narayan Singh v. the State of Hp and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Meenakshi Thakur Vs Honourable High Court of Himachal Pradesh and Others

Abhishek @ Shekhu Vs the State of Hp and Others

Union of India and Ors. Vs Soman Devi

Union of India and Ors. Vs Col Khem Singh Mandhotra

Cskhpkv Vs Bishan Dass

Cskhpkv Vs Surjeet Kumar