Himachal Pradesh HC, CWP 10236/2024, decided 10.03.2025 by G.S. Sandhawalia, CJ (with Ranjan Sharma, J); parole petition of Abhishek @ Shekhu dismissed as infructuous after conviction appeal allowed; oral order, no merits adjudicated, no statute or precedent cited.
2025:HHC:5500
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
CWP No.10236 of 2024 Decided on:10.03.2025
__________________________________________________________ Abhishek @ Shekhu ...Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & ors. ...Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice G.S. Sandhawalia, Chief Justice Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Sharma, Judge 1 Whether approved for reporting?. For the petitioner: Mr. Sunil Kumar, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Pranay Pratap Singh, Additional Advocate General.
G.S. Sandhawalia, Chief Justice [Oral]
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that
the present petition has been rendered infructuous, since the appeal against conviction has been allowed, therefore, the request of parole is no longer required to be pressed.
Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed as having become infructuous along with pending
miscellaneous application(s), if any.
(G.S. Sandhawalia) Chief Justice
(Ranjan Sharma) Judge
March 10, 2025 [Shivender/Himani]
1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
How this case reached the court
The petitioner's appeal against conviction has been allowed, rendering the parole petition unnecessary; counsel stated the parole request would no longer be pressed.¶7
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
