A review petition was dismissed as none appeared for the petitioner despite repeated calls; the court dismissed it for want of appearance and non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Vice Chancellor Vs. Sanjna Thakur & others
Review Petition No. 114 of 2023 in CWP No. 482 of 2023
10.12.2024
Present None for the petitioner/respondent No. 4.
Mr. Kamal Thakur, Advocate, vice Ms. Madhurika Sekhon Verma, Advocate, for the caveator/petitioner.
Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Mr. Rakesh Dhaulta, Mr. Pranay Pratap Singh, Mr. Gobind Korla, Additional Advocates General with Ms. Priyanka Chauhan & Mr. Sidharth Jalta, Deputy Advocates General, for respondents No. 3, 5 & 6/State.
Despite repeated calls, none appeared on behalf of the petitioner. Therefore, this Court is left with no other option, but to dismiss this petition for want of appearance and non-persecution. Ordered accordingly.
(Tarlok Singh Chauhan) Acting Chief Justice
(Ajay Mohan Goel)
Judge.
December 10, 2024 (hemlata)
Vice Chancellor
Sanjna Thakur
Tarlok Singh Chauhan
Ajay Mohan Goel
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
