The court allowed the application for condonation of delay in filing a Review Petition, finding sufficient cause for the 76-day delay as stated in the application. The application was disposed of, and the Review Petition was registered with notice issued to the respondent.
Delay of 76 days in filing Review Petition condoned; application disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HRTC & others Vs. Amar Chand
CMP (M) No. 1251 of 2023
10.12.2024 Present Mr. Vinod Kumar Gupta, Advocate, for the applicants.
For the reasons stated in the application,
particularly in paras 2 & 3 of the application, which prevented the applicant from filing the Review Petition within the prescribed period of limitation, we find sufficient cause having been carved out by the applicant to condone the delay of 76 days, that has crept-up in filing the Review Petition. Ordered accordingly. Application stands disposed of.
Review Petition No. of 2024
Review Petition be registered.
Notice be issued to the respondent returnable within three weeks, on taking steps within one weeks.
List on 09.01.2025 .
(Tarlok Singh Chauhan) Acting Chief Justice
(Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge.
December 10, 2024 (hemlata)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether sufficient cause exists to condone a 76-day delay in filing the Review Petition?
HRTC & others
Amar Chand
Tarlok Singh Chauhan
Ajay Mohan Goel
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
