The appellant sought permission to withdraw the appeal. The respondents did not oppose the prayer. The Court granted permission and dismissed the appeal as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2024:HHC:11683 )
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
FAO(OS) No. 18 of 2024.
Date of decision:18.11.2024.
Chain Singh
…..Appellant.
Versus
H.P. State Civil Supplied Corporation Ltd. & anr.
…..Respondents.
Coram
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Acting Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Satyen Vaidya, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?1 No
For the Appellant : Mr. Neel Kamal Sood, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Vasu Sood, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. Prashant Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.1. Mr. Anand Sharma, Sr. Advocate, with Mr. Karan Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.2.
Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Acting Chief Justice (oral)
Learned counsel for the appellant seeks permission of
this Court to withdraw this appeal. Prayer allowed as not opposed.
1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the Judgment?Yes
2024:HHC:11683 )
also the pending application(s), if any.
(Tarlok Singh Chauhan) Acting Chief Justice
(Satyen Vaidya) Judge
18th November, 2024. ( mamta )
Chain Singh
H.P. State Civil Supplied Corporation Ltd.
anr.
Tarlok Singh Chauhan
Satyen Vaidya
As recorded by the court registry
An appeal to a Division Bench against an order made by a single judge on the original side of the High Court.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
