The court condoned a delay of 49 days in filing an appeal under CMP(M) No. 362 of 2024, recognizing sufficient cause shown by the applicant. The application was disposed of and the matter listed for admission.
Delay of 49 days in filing the appeal was condoned.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Ashwani Kumar Vs . Poonam Matlotia
CMP(M) No. 362 of 2024 in FAO
18.11.2024 Present: Mr. Paras Dhaulta, Advocate, for the applicant/ appellant.
Mr. Pawan Gautam, Advocate, for the respondent.
CMP(M) No. 362 of 2024
Despite repeated opportunities, respondent has failed
to file the reply.
For the reasons stated in the application, which is duly supported by an affidavit of applicant/appellant, we find sufficient cause having been carved out which prevented the applicant/appellant from filing the appeal within the prescribed period of limitation. Accordingly, the delay of 49 days’ in filing the appeal is condoned. Ordered accordingly. Application stands disposed of.
Be registered.
List for admission before the appropriate Bench on
25.11.2024.
( Tarlok Singh Chauhan ) Acting Chief Justice
(Satyen Vaidya) 18th November, 2024 Judge (sushma)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the delay of 49 days in filing the appeal should be condoned.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Ashwani Kumar
Poonam Matlotia
Tarlok Singh Chauhan
Satyen Vaidya
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
