Himachal Pradesh High Court dismissed an appeal as withdrawn by the appellant following a post-filing compromise settlement deed between the parties.
Appeal dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
FAO (FC) No. 23 of 2022 Date of Decision : 18.12.2024
Jagdev ....Appellant Versus Nisha Devi ....Respondent
Coram
Hon’ble Mr Justice Vivek Singh Thakur, Judge. Hon’ble Mr Justice Rakesh Kainthla , Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the appellant : Mr. C.N. Singh, Advocate. For the Respondent : Mr. Goldy Kumar, Advocate.
Vivek Singh Thakur, Judge (Oral)
Learned counsel for the appellant has placed on record photocopy of Agreement-cum-Settlement Deed, dated 12.12.2024, claiming it as compromise arrived at between the parties for amicable settlement of their disputes, with further submission that he has instructions to withdraw the present appeal.
Learned counsel for the respondent has endorsed the compromise arrived at between the parties.
In view of the above, appeal is dismissed as withdrawn alongwith pending applications, if any.
(Vivek Singh Thakur) Judge
( Rakesh Kainthla) Judge
18th December, 2024 (Chander)
1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes.
Jagdev
Nisha Devi
Vivek Singh Thakur
Rakesh Kainthla
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
