Criminal appeal against a respondent declared a proclaimed offender. SP, Kullu reported no movable or immovable property of the offender could be traced despite efforts. The appeal was closed and disposed of with liberty to revive upon apprehension of the respondent.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. ( 2024:HHC:14812 )
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
Cr. Appeal No. 123 of 2019 Date of Decision: 17.12.2024
State of H.P
...Appellant
Versus
Prem Roqa
...Respondent
Coram
Hon’ble Mr Justice Vivek Singh Thakur, Judge.
Hon’ble Mr Justice Rakesh Kainthla , Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?1
| For the Appellant | : | Mr. Ramakant Advocate Gener |
Sharma, Additional al. |
|---|---|---|---|
| For the Respondent | : | None. | |
| For Union of India | : | Mr. Lokender Panel Counsel. |
Paul Thakur, Senior |
Vivek Singh Thakur, Judge, (oral)
In sequal to order dated 13.11.2024, Superintendent of Police, Kullu had filed status report on his affidavit stating therein that despite all out efforts, no movable or immovable property, owned and possessed by the respondent/proclaimed offender, could be traced.
1
Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes.
2
Neutral Citation No. ( 2024:HHC:14812 )
of any kind of movable or immovable property including bank account vehicle or landed property.
matter.
(Vivek Singh Thakur)
Judge
( Rakesh Kainthla)
Judge
17th December, 2024
( saurav pathania )
State of H.P
Prem Roqa
Vivek Singh Thakur
Rakesh Kainthla
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
