Family court appeal dismissed as infructuous after appellant's counsel stated the appeal had become infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. ( 2024:HHC:5192 )
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
FAO (FC) no. 19 of 2024 Date of decision : 16.07.2024. Kanchan Kumari ...Appellant. Versus Vikas Bhuria …Respondent
Coram:
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice M.S. Ramachandra Rao, Chief Justice. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Satyen Vaidya, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?
For the appellant : Mr. Nitin Thakur, Advocate.
For the respondent : Mr. Ganesh Barowalia & Mr. Rohit, Advocates.
M.S. Ramachandra Rao Chief Justice, (Oral):
Counsel for the appellant states that this appeal has
become infructuous. Accordingly, the same is disposed of.
Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of.
(M.S. Ramachandra Rao) Chief Justice
16th July, 2024 (kck)
(Satyen Vaidya) Judge
Kanchan Kumari
Vikas Bhuria
M.S. Ramachandra Rao
Satyen Vaidya
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
