A family court appeal was not pressed by the appellant's counsel on instructions; the court dismissed the appeal along with pending applications.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
FAO(FC) No. 10 of 2020.
Date of decision: 18.04.2024.
Dimple Kumari …..Appellant.
Versus
Vaneet Kumar …..Respondent. Coram
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?1 No
For the Appellant : Mr. G.R.Palsra, Advocate.
For the Respondent : None
Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge (Oral)
Learned counsel for the appellant states that he is
under instructions not to press this appeal.
pressed, so also the pending application(s), if any.
(Tarlok Singh Chauhan) Judge
(Sushil Kukreja)
Judge
April 18, 2024. ( krt )
1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the Judgment?Yes
Dimple Kumari
Vaneet Kumar
Tarlok Singh Chauhan
Sushil Kukreja
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
