State of Hp and Others v. Sunil Kumar Chandel and Others
Case brief
What is this about?
H.P. and others vs. Dr. Sunil Kumar Chandel…
H.P. and others vs. Dr. Sunil Kumar Chandel…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
State of H.P. and others vs. Dr. Sunil Kumar Chandel and others.
CMP(M) No.85 of 2024.
18.04.2024. Present:
Mr. Ramakant Sharma and Ms. Sharmila Patial, Additional Advocate Generals with Mr. J.S.Guleria and Mr. Raj Negi, Deputy Advocate Generals, for the applicants-appellants.
Mr. Sunny Dhatwalia, Advocate, for respondents No. 1 to 4.
Mr. Tek Ram Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.5.
Mr. Sunny Dhatwalia and Mr. Tek Ram Sharma, Advocates, have put in appearance on behalf of respondents No. 1 to 4 and 5 respectively.
For the reasons stated in the application which is duly supported by an affidavit of Under Secretary (Agriculture) to the Government of Himachal Pradesh, we deem it appropriate to condone 66 days’ delay that has crept up in filing of the appeal. Ordered accordingly. Application stands disposed of.
Appeal be registered.
LPA No. of 2024.
List for consideration on 02.05.2024.
(Tarlok Singh Chauhan) Judge
(Sushil Kukreja) Judge
April 18, 2024. (krt)
State of H.P.
Dr. Sunil Kumar Chandel
Tarlok Singh Chauhan
Sushil Kukreja
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court