Execution petition seeking compliance with a prior judgment; the State submitted that the judgment had been complied with, and the petition was disposed of as fully satisfied.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
Execution Petition No.849 of 2024 Decided on: 4.12.2024 Om Prakash ...Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. & others …Respondents.
Coram
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Acting Chief Justice. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Satyen Vaidya, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1
For the petitioner : Mr. Vijay Kumar, Advocate.
For the respondents : Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General, with Mr. Rakesh Dhaulta, Mr. Govind Korla, Additional Advocates General and Ms. Priyanka Chauhan, & Mr. Arsh Rattan, Deputy Advocates General.
Tarlok Singh Chauhan,Acting Chief Justice(oral)
Learned Additional Advocate General, fairly submits that
the judgment in question has been complied with.
(Tarlok Singh Chauhan) Acting Chief Justice
(Satyen Vaidya) 4 th December, 2024 Judge (veena)
1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
Om Prakash
State of H.P.
Tarlok Singh Chauhan
Satyen Vaidya
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
