Single Judge bench disposed of an execution petition holding the impugned judgment fully complied with, despite the petitioner's claim about ungranted promotion. Liberty was reserved for the petitioner to agitate the promotion claim separately.
Instant petition disposed of as satisfied with liberty to agitate claim for promotion separately.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA
Ex. Petition No.655 of 2024. Decided on : 04.12.2024.
Raghuvir Singh . …..Petitioner.
Versus
Himachal Road Transport Corporation, Shimla-I ….Respondent.
Coram
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Acting Chief Justice. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Satyen Vaidya, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?1 No.
For the Petitioner : Mr. Hirdaya Ram, Advocate. For the Respondent : Mr. Raman Jamalta, Advocate.
Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Acting Chief Justice ( Oral )
A perusal of compliance affidavit indicates that the judgment sought to be executed has been fully complied with. However, learned counsel for the petitioner would argue that his client has not been granted his due promotion.
1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the Judgment?Yes
:-2-:
to the petitioner to agitate his claim with regard to his promotion in
accordance with law.
(Tarlok Singh Chauhan) Acting Chief Justice
(Satyen Vaidya) Judge
04th December, 2024.
(yogesh/pankaj)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the execution petition can be disposed of as satisfied though the petitioner claims promotion was not granted.
Raghuvir Singh
Himachal Road Transport Corporation, Shimla-I
Tarlok Singh Chauhan
Satyen Vaidya
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
