Disposed¶¶6

Anant Ram v. State of Hp

Himachal Pradesh HC22 Apr 2024EX.P./232/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Execution petition before the High Court of Himachal Pradesh at Shimla; Anant Ram v. State of H.P. & Ors.; Ex. Pet. No.232 of 2024; decided 22.04.2024; Bench: Justices Tarlok Singh Chauhan and Sushil Kukreja (oral order). Key terms: direction to implement judgment; Suraj Mani's case; SLP filed by respondents pending; compliance within four weeks; petition disposed of. Petitioner represented by Ms. Babita (vice Mr. A.K. Gupta); respondents represented by Advocate General Anup Rattan with I.N. Mehta, Ramakant Sharma and Sharmila Patial. No monetary award; no statute cited.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the respondents to implement the judgment in Suraj Mani's case, subject to the final outcome of the SLP filed by them, with compliance to be effected within four weeks. ¶¶6

Anant Ram Vs State of Hp — Himachal Pradesh HC (2024) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA

¶2

Ex. Pet. No.232 of 2024 Decided on: 22.04.2024.

¶3

_____________________ Anant Ram	____________________________________ ....Petitioner Versus
State of H.P. & Ors.	…Respondents
Coram
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Tarl Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sush 1 Whether approved for re	ok Singh Chauhan, Judge. il Kukreja, Judge. porting? No.
For the petitioner	: Ms. Babita Advocate vice Mr. A.K. Gupta, Advocate.
For the respondents	: Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Mr. I.N. Mehta, Senior Additional Advocate General, Mr. Ramakant
	Sharma and Ms. Sharmila Patial, Additional Advocates General.
Tarlok Singh Chauhan, J	udge (Oral)