Raj Pal v. State of Hp
Case brief
What is this about?
Petition rendered infructuous with efflux of time as submitted by counsel; court disposed of the petition and pending application.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CWPOA No.7022 of 2020. Date of decision: 22.04.2024.
Raj Pal and another …..Petitioners.
Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh and another …..Respondents. Coram
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?1 No
For the Petitioners : Mr. Sanjeev Bhushan, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sohail Khan, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Mr. I.N. Mehta, Mr. Yashwardhan Chauhan, Senior Additional Advocate Generals, Mr. Ramakant Sharma, Ms. Sharmila Patial, Additional Advocate Generals and Mr. Raj Negi, Deputy Advocate General.
Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge (Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that this petition has become infructuous with efflux of time. His statement is taken on record.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Raj Pal and another
- respondent
State of Himachal Pradesh and another
Coram
Tarlok Singh Chauhan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Himachal Pradesh HC
- Decided on
- · April
- Registered
- Case no.
- CWPOA/7022/2020
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court