Disposed
Gaurav Kaushal v. State of Hp
Himachal Pradesh HCCWPOA/7083/2020
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The petition was disposed of as rendered infructuous due to the efflux of time.
What the court decided
AI extract
The petition was disposed of as rendered infructuous due to the efflux of time.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CWPOA No.7083 of 2020. Date of decision: 02.05.2024.
Gourav Kaushal …..Petitioner.
Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh and Ors. …..Respondents. Coram
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?1 No
For the Petitioner : Mr. Bhim Raj Sharma, Advocate vice Mr. Naresh Verma, Advocate.
For the Respondents : Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Mr. Yashwardhan Chauhan, Senior Additional Advocate General, Mr. Ramakant Sharma, Ms. Sharmila Patial, Additional Advocate Generals Mr. J.S. Guleria and Mr. Raj Negi, Deputy Advocate Generals.
Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge (Oral)
Learned vice counsel for the petitioner fairly submits
that this petition has been rendered infructuous with efflux of time.
been rendered infructuous, so also the pending application, if any.
(Tarlok Singh Chauhan) Judge
(Sushil Kukreja) Judge
May 02, 2024. ( krt )
1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the Judgment?Yes
Gourav Kaushal
State of Himachal Pradesh
Ors.
Tarlok Singh Chauhan
Sushil Kukreja
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court