The present petition was dismissed as infructuous. No substantive legal issue was addressed as the proceedings were concluded due to the disposal of the petition.
dismissal of petition and pending miscellaneous applications as infructuous
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA CWPOA No. 6598 of 2020 Decided on: 18th April, 2024
____________________________________________________ Sh. Karan Chand and another ....Petitioners. Versus State of H.P & another …..Respondents. ____________________________________________________ Coram_ Hon’ble Mr. Justice M.S. Ramachandra Rao, Chief Justice Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?1
For the petitioners: Ms. Babita, Advocate vice Mr. A.K. Gupta, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Rakesh Dhaulta and Mr. Pranay Pratap Singh, Additional Advocate Generals for respondent No.1. None for respondent No.2.
M.S. Ramachandra Rao, Chief Justice (oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioners states that the present
petition has become infructuous.
having become infructuous, alongwith pending miscellaneous application(s), if any.
( M.S. Ramachandra Rao ) Chief Justice
18th April, 2024 (Jyotsna Rewal Dua) (priti) Judge
1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
Karan Chand and another
State of H.P
another
M.S. Ramachandra Rao
Ajay Mohan Goel
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
