The appellant sought withdrawal of appeal No.56 of 2024; the court granted permission and dismissed the appeal accordingly.
Permission to withdraw appeal granted; appeal dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
| LPA No.56 of 2024 Decided on: 4thApril, 2024 |
|---|
| ______________________________________________________ Inder Singh Guleria …..Appellant Versus |
| Union of India & Ors. …Respondents |
| _______________________________________________________ Coram |
| Hon’ble Mr. Justice M. S. Ramachandra Rao, Chief Justice |
| Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge |
| 1 Whether approved for reporting? |
| _____________________________________________________ For the appellant: Mr. Deven Krishan Khanna, Advocate. |
| For the respondents: Mr. Balram Sharma, Deputy Solicitor General of India, for respondents no.1 and 2. |
M.S.Ramachandra Rao, Chief Justice (Oral)
Learned counsel for the appellant seeks permission to
withdraw the present appeal. Permission granted. Accordingly, the
appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand
disposed of.
(M. S. Ramachandra Rao) Chief Justice
April 4, 2024 R.Atal
(Jyotsna Rewal Dua) Judge
Inder Singh Guleria
Union of India
M. S. Ramachandra Rao
Jyotsna Rewal Dua
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
