Petitioners withdrew the petition with instructions. The court dismissed the petition since it was not pressed by counsel.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CWPOA No.6325 of 2020 Date of Decision: 01.05.2024
___________________________________________________ Dr. Sunil Sharma and others ....Petitioners Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & another …Respondents __________________________________________________ Coram_ The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja, Judge
Whether approved for reporting?1 No.
________________________________________________ For the petitioners : Mr. Sanjeev Singh, Advocate vice Mr. Atul G. Sood, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Mr. Ramakant Sharma, Ms. Sharmila Patial, Additional Advocates General, Mr. J.S. Guleria & Mr.Raj Negi, Deputy Advocates General. ________________________________________________
Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge (Oral)
Learned vice counsel for the petitioners states that
he is under instructions not to press this petition. The same is accordingly dismissed as not pressed.
Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand
disposed of.
(Tarlok Singh Chauhan) Judge
(Sushil Kukreja) May 01, 2024 Judge (VH)
1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
Dr. Sunil Sharma and others
State of Himachal Pradesh & another
Tarlok Singh Chauhan
Sushil Kukreja
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
