A writ petition filed by Rampal Singh against the State of Himachal Pradesh was dismissed as the petitioner's counsel requested and the court accepted the withdrawal of the instant petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA.
CWPIL No.9 of 2024 Decided on: 19.12.2024
Rampal Singh .....Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & Others ...Respondents
Coram
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Acting Chief Justice Hon’ble Mr. Justice Satyen Vaidya, Judge
Whether approved for reporting?1
For the petitioner : Ms. Kaushiky, Advocate vice Dr. Rajesh Kumar Parmar, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Mr. Rakesh Daulta, Mr. Gobind Korla, Additional Advocate Generals and Ms. Priyanka Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General.
Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Acting Chief Justice (Oral)
Learned vice counsel appearing for the petitioner states that she is under instructions to withdraw the instant petition. Her statement is taken on record.
also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any.
( Tarlok Singh Chauhan ) Acting Chief Justice
December 19, 2024 ( Satyen Vaidya ) (Yashwant) Judge
1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
Rampal Singh
State of Himachal Pradesh
Others
Tarlok Singh Chauhan
Satyen Vaidya
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
