This single-paragraph order notes that the impugned judgment was complied with via a consideration order. The Court disposed of the execution petition as infructuous, sparing petitioners from filing a separate challenge to that order.
Petition disposed of as infructuous since the impugned judgment was complied with.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2024:HHC:15043
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
Execution Petition (T) No.244 of 2024. Date of decision: 18.12.2024.
Anita Devi & anr.
…..Petitioners. Versus State of H.P & anr. …..Respondents.
Coram
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Acting Chief Justice.
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Satyen Vaidya, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?1
For the Petitioner : Mr. Bhupinder Thakur, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. Anup Rattan, A.G with Mr. Rakesh Dhaulta, Add.A.G.
Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Acting Chief Justice ( Oral )
Learned Additional Advocate General has placed on
record instructions dated 13.12.2024 alongwith a copy of Office Order dated 6.12.2024, which go to indicate that the judgment, in question, has been complied with by passing a consideration order.
1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the Judgment?Yes
2 2024:HHC:15043
(Tarlok Singh Chauhan) Acting Chief Justice
(Satyen Vaidya)
18th December, 2024. ( mamta )
Judge
Anita Devi
Respondent No.1 (anr)
State of H.P
Tarlok Singh Chauhan
Satyen Vaidya
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
