Petitioner stated before the Court that the mandate of the judgment sought to be complied with has been complied with by the State. Finding nothing left to adjudicate, the Court closed the proceedings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Man Singh Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh & Ors.
CWP No. 9475 of 2024
25.07.2025
Present: Ms. Archna Dutt, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Rajan Kahol, Mr. Vishal Panwar & Mr. B.C. Verma, Additional Advocates General with Mr. Ravi Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General, for respondents-State.
Learned counsel for the petitioner fairly states that mandate contained in the judgment, sought to be complied with, stands complied with.
In view of the above, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the instant proceedings and accordingly, the same are closed.
July 25, 2025 (Sandeep Sharma), (s unil) Judge
Man Singh
State of Himachal Pradesh
Sandeep Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
