Pappy v. State of Hp
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court allowed the petitioner to withdraw the bail petition with liberty to file afresh upon the respondent's status report being considered.
What did the court decide?
Permission to withdraw petition with liberty to file afresh.
What the court decided
2024:HHC:7962
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA Cr. MP (M) No. 1807 of 2024 Date of Decision: 05.09.2024 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Pappy alias Papi ...Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh …Respondent ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 . ----------------------------------------------------------------------------For the Petitioner: Mr. Tarun Brakta, Advocate. For the Respondent: Mr. Rajan Kahol, Mr. Vishal Panwar and Mr. B.C.Verma, Additional Advocate Generals, with Mr. Ravi Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General. ASI Jagdish Chand present in person alongwith the record. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Sandeep Sharma, J. (Oral)
Having carefully perused the status report filed on behalf of the respondent-State, learned counsel representing the bail petitioner, seeks permission to withdraw the present petition at this stage with liberty to file afresh at appropriate stage, in accordance with law, if required and desired.
- Ordered accordingly.
(Sandeep Sharma) Judge
September 5,2024 (shankar)
1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Pappy alias Papi
- respondent
State of Himachal Pradesh
Coram
Sandeep Sharma
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Himachal Pradesh HC
- Decided on
- · September
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRMPM/1807/2024
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court