Writ petition disposed of with direction that if petitioners file representations on the issue raised within four weeks, the competent Authority shall pass speaking orders in accordance with law within eight weeks thereafter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2024:HHC:8247
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CWP No. 9459 of 2024 Decided on: 10.09.2024 Sanjeev Kumar and others … Petitioners Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others … Respondents
Coram
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?1
| ___________________________ For the petitioners : |
__________________________ Mr. Anil Kumar, Advocate. |
|---|---|
| For the respondents : |
Mr. Pushpender Jaswal, Addl. AG. |
| Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge | ( Oral) |
Notice. Mr. Pushpender Jaswal, learned Additional Advocate General, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents.
(Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge September 10, 2024 ( narender )
1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
Sanjeev Kumar and others
State of Himachal Pradesh and others
Ajay Mohan Goel
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
