Writ petition closed after respondents filed a compliance affidavit. The court reserved liberty to the petitioner to seek appropriate legal remedy for her surviving grievances, including against the consideration order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Sapna Devi Vs. State of HP & Anr.
CWP No. 8968 of 2024
18.03.2025 Present: Mr. Subhash Chander, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. L.N.Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for respondents No. 1 to 3-State.
Mr. Manohar Lal Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.4.
Respondents have filed the compliance
affidavit.
Taking note of the same, these proceedings are closed. However, liberty is reserved to the petitioner to seek appropriate remedy, as may be available to her in law for redressal of her surviving grievances including against consideration order.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge March 18, 2025 (R.Atal)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the compliance affidavit filed by respondents suffices to close the writ proceedings, with liberty for surviving grievances.
Sapna Devi
State of HP
Respondent No.4
Jyotsna Rewal Dua
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
