Petitioner filed representation regarding grievances. Respondents submitted it would be decided in six weeks. Petition disposed of with direction to list for compliance.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
C WP No.6857 of 2024 Date of Decision : 08.08.2024
Brestu Ram
…… Petitioner
Versus
The Himachal Pradesh Tourism Development and another
……Respondents
Coram:
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Bipin Chander Negi, Judge
Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Mr. Ajeet Singh Saklani, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Shivank Singh Panta, Advocate.
Bipin Chander Negi, Judge (oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that with respect to the grievances being raised in the present petition, an appropriate representation dated 02.05.2024 stands filed by the petitioner. The same is appended along with the present petition as Annexure P-5.
1
Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes
2
List for compliance on 24.10.2024.
August 8th , 2024 (KS)
( Bipin Chander Negi) Judge
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the representation filed by the petitioner regarding service grievances shall be decided within a specific timeline?
Brestu Ram
The Himachal Pradesh Tourism Development
another
Bipin Chander Negi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
