The petitioner placed in court and withdrew the writ petition with liberty to pursue other remedies. The court disposed of pending miscellaneous applications accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2024:HHC:6571-DB
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
| CWP N Decid |
o. 127 of 2017 ed on: 07.08.2024 |
|---|---|
| Leena Niti Versus |
… Petitioner |
| Central Board of Secondary Education & | |
| others |
… Respondents |
| Coram |
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1
| ______________________ For the petitioner |
_____ : |
________________________ Mr. Surinder Saklani, Advocate. |
|---|---|---|
| For the respondents | : | None for respondent No.1. Mr.Dilip Sharma, Senior Advocate, with Mr.Manish Sharma, Advocate, for respondents No.2 and 3. |
Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral)
Learned Senior Counsel appearing for the respondents has submitted that in light of the adjudication by Hon’ble Supreme Court of India, in Army Welfare Education Society vs. Sunil Kumar Sharma, reported in 2024 SCC OnLine SC 1683, the present Writ petition is not maintainable as the respondent-School happens to be a privately managed school which does not receives any grant from the Government.
2
2024:HHC:6571-DB
Forum, jurisdiction whereof may be invoked by the petitioner.
disposed of accordingly.
(Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge
August 07, 2024
(Rishi)
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Army Welfare Education Society vs. Sunil Kumar SharmaReferred¶7
2024 SCC OnLine SC 1683 · Who else cites this
Leena Niti
Central Board of Secondary Education
Ajay Mohan Goel
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
