Allowed

Suresh Kumar v. State of Hp and Others

Himachal Pradesh HC14 Nov 2024CWP/647/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single judge allowed the current writ petition by disposing of it without expressing an opinion on merits. The petitioner was granted liberty to file a representation within two weeks, directing the competent authority to decide it via a speaking order within six weeks, relying on a prior Division Bench judgment.

What did the court decide?

Petition disposed with liberty to file representation within two weeks; competent authority to decide by speaking order within six weeks.

Suresh Kumar Vs State of Hp and… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Himachal Pradesh HC (2024)

¶1

2024:HHC:11418

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA

¶3

CWP No. 647 of 2024 Decided on: 14.11.2024 Suresh Kumar … Petitioner

¶4

Versus

¶5

State of Himachal Pradesh and others …Respondents

¶6

Coram

¶7

Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge.

¶8

Whether approved for reporting?¹

¶9

_____________________________________________________ For the petitioner : Mr. Vinay Sharma, Advocate. For the respondent : Mr. Sumit Sharma, Dy. AG.

¶10

Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral)

¶11

Notice. Mr. Sumit Sharma, learned Deputy Advocate General, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents.

¶12

Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the prayer made herein is squarely covered by the judgment passed by Hon’ble Division Bench of this Court in CWP No. 2004 of 2017 alongwith connected matters, titled Taj Mohammad and others vs. State of H.P. and others , decided on 03.08.2023. He further submits it would be in the interest of justice, in case, this petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file a representation within a period of two weeks from today with direction that let said representation of the petitioner be decided by the Competent Authority, in terms of the averments made in the representation as well as the judgments being relied upon by the petitioner therein.

¶13

1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

¶14

¶15

2024:HHC:11418

¶16

Accordingly, without expressing any opinion on the merit of the case, this petition is disposed of with the direction that in the event of the petitioner filing a representation within two weeks from today, the same be decided by the Competent Authority, in view of the averments made therein, taking into consideration the judgment(s) being relied upon by the petitioner therein, by passing a speaking order, within a period of six weeks from today.

¶17

Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, also stand disposed of accordingly.

¶18

(Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge

¶19

November, 14, 2024 (narender)

Suresh Kumar v. State of Hp and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Suresh Kumar v. State of Hp and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Virender Pratap Singh Vs State of Hp and Another

Manmohan Singh Vs State of Hp and Another

Sunny Kumar Vs State of Hp and Another

Harmesh Chand Vs State of Hp and Others

Sunil Kumar Vs State of Hp and Others

Suresh Surya Vs State of Hp and Others