Single judge disposed of the Civil Writ Petition without expressing an opinion on merits, directing the petitioner to file a representation for consideration by the Competent Authority via a speaking order.
Petitioner directed to file representation within two weeks for Competent Authority to decide within six weeks via speaking order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2024:HHC:11415
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CWP No. 348 of 2024 Decided on: 14.11.2024 Suresh Surya … Petitioner
Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh and others …Respondents
Coram
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?1
_____________________________________________________ For the petitioner : Mr. Vinay Sharma, Advocate.
For the respondent : Mr. Sumit Sharma, Dy. AG.
Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral)
Notice. Mr. Sumit Sharma, learned Deputy Advocate General, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents.
1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2
2024:HHC:11415
(Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge
November, 14, 2024 (narender)
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Taj Mohammad and others vs. State of H.P. and othersReferred¶13
CWP No. 2004 of 2017 Taj Mohammad and others vs. State of H.P. and others
Suresh Surya
State of Himachal Pradesh and others
Ajay Mohan Goel
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
