The petitioner sought withdrawal of the writ petition with liberty to raise the industrial dispute qua the issue raised. The High Court allowed the withdrawal and dismissed the petition with such liberty, directing that time spent be considered for future proceedings.
Liberty granted to raise industrial dispute; time spent taken into consideration.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2024:HHC:11049-DB
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CWP No. 3641 of 2020 Decided on: 11.11.2024 Sant Lal … Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & others … Respondents
Coram
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1
____________________________________________________ _ For the petitioner : Mr. Viveka Nand, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Rajat Chauhan, Advocate.
Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner be allowed to withdraw the petition with liberty to raise industrial dispute qua the issue which has been raised by way of this petition.
(Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge
November 11, 2024 (Rishi)
1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition regarding an industrial dispute should be allowed to be withdrawn with liberty to raise the dispute separately?
Sant Lal
State of Himachal Pradesh & others
Ajay Mohan Goel
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
