Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to seek redressal of grievances through remedies available in law.
Liberty to pursue available legal remedies; petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CWP No. 3566/2024 Decided on: 17.07.2024 Rahul Kumar …Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & others ....Respondents. ………………………………………………………………………………. Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioners : Mr. Jeevan Kumar, Advocate. For respondents. : Mr. Y.P.S. Dhaulta Additional Advocate General, for respondents No.1, 5 & 6. Mr. Vishwajeet Singh, Advocate, for respondent No.2. Ms. Anchal Singh, Advocate vice Mr. Vinod Chauhan, Advocate, for respondents No.3 & 4.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua , J
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition as the petitioner intends to avail the remedy as may be available to him in law for redressal of his grievances. Granting such liberty, the present writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. The pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of
Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge July 17, 2024 (rohit)
1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition should be permitted to be withdrawn so that the petitioner may pursue alternative remedies.
Rahul Kumar
State of H.P.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
