Petitioner's writ petition held infructuous due to efflux of time. Petition allowed with interim measures vacated. No substantive legal principle elucidated.
Petition allowed on grounds of infructuousness; interim orders vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2024:HHC:13936-DB
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CWP No.355 of 2016
Date of Decision: 10.12.2024
____________ ___________________________________________ Ashwani Kumar Sharma …….Petitioner Versus Election Commission of India & others … Respondents _______________________________________________________
Coram:
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1
For the Petitioner: Mr. Ajay Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Atharv Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. Balram Sharma, Deputy Solicitor General of India, for respondent No.1. Mr. Rajan Kahol, Mr. Vishal Panwar and Mr. B.C.Verma, Additional Advocate Generals, with Mr. Ravi Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General, for respondent Nos. 2 and 3. Mr. K.D.Sood, Senior Advocate with Mr. Het Ram Thakur, Advocate, for respondent Nos. 4 and 5. _______________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, Judge (oral): Learned counsel representing the petitioner fairly states that with the efflux of time, present petition has been rendered infructuous and as such, same may be disposed of accordingly.
(Sandeep Sharma), Judge
December 10, 2024
(shankar)
1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
Ashwani Kumar Sharma
Election Commission of India
Sandeep Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
